*1. Startup Process:
- Systemd: Uses parallelization to speed up boot, starting services in parallel based on dependencies.
- Non-Systemd: Typically uses sequential service startup (e.g., SysVinit) which can be slower.
2. Service Management:
- Systemd: Unified management via systemctl commands (e.g., `systemctl start <service>`, `systemctl stop <service>`).
- Non-Systemd: Services are managed with older tools like `service` or custom init scripts (e.g., `/etc/init.d/`).
3. Process and Resource Control:
- Systemd: Uses cgroups for advanced process and resource management, including memory and CPU control.
- Non-Systemd: Lacks these advanced management features and is more basic in service control.
4. Configuration and Syntax:
- Systemd: Uses unit files for service configuration, providing a standardized format with many options.
- Non-Systemd: Uses simpler configuration scripts or sysvinit-style scripts which are less standardized and feature-rich.
5. Logging:
- Systemd: Uses journald, a centralized and binary logging system, viewable with `journalctl`.
- Non-Systemd: Relies on traditional text-based logs (e.g., `/var/log/messages`) and may use external tools for log management.
6. Adoption and Popularity:
- Systemd: Default on most popular distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, CentOS).
- Non-Systemd: Used by niche distributions (e.g., Devuan, Void Linux, Alpine Linux) where simplicity or a preference for alternative init systems is desired.
7. Performance:
- Systemd: Faster boot times and more efficient resource management due to parallel service startup and advanced features.
- Non-Systemd: Slower boot times due to sequential service startup and lack of optimization.
===== Summary =====
- Systemd is a modern, comprehensive init system with a focus on performance, service management, and logging. It is widely adopted and used in most mainstream Linux distributions.
- Non-systemd is preferred by users who want simplicity, minimalism, or who prefer a different init system. It’s typically used by smaller or more niche distributions.
Use Cases:
- Systemd: Ideal for users who want a fast, feature-rich, and widely supported system with centralized management.
- Non-Systemd**: Preferred by users who value simplicity or want to avoid the overhead and complexity of systemd.